<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: KDE4 &#8211; Is it worth upgrading?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gofedora.com/review-kde4-worth-upgrading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>How Tos, Tutorials, Tips and Tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Subhodip Biswas</title>
		<link>http://gofedora.com/review-kde4-worth-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Subhodip Biswas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=191#comment-278</guid>
		<description>damm ..you using development repo ..how do you expect it not to crash ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damm ..you using development repo ..how do you expect it not to crash &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maruti Borker</title>
		<link>http://gofedora.com/review-kde4-worth-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Maruti Borker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=191#comment-274</guid>
		<description>rightly said ... it isnt worth and upgrade for fedora guys .. it was running coool in ubuntu :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rightly said &#8230; it isnt worth and upgrade for fedora guys .. it was running coool in ubuntu <img src='http://gofedora.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tsiolkovsky</title>
		<link>http://gofedora.com/review-kde4-worth-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Tsiolkovsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=191#comment-275</guid>
		<description>It looks like a packaging problem with Fedora packages. I&#039;m running KDE 4.0.0 on Mandriva 2008, with packages available from kde.org and it is also running fine here. I think it actally a very nice *.0.0 release, I still remember KDE 3.0.0 and things this time are a lot better. And I also think there is much more technology in there this time. I&#039;m confident that KDE 4.1 which is supposed to be released sometime in august this year, will absolutely rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like a packaging problem with Fedora packages. I&#8217;m running KDE 4.0.0 on Mandriva 2008, with packages available from kde.org and it is also running fine here. I think it actally a very nice *.0.0 release, I still remember KDE 3.0.0 and things this time are a lot better. And I also think there is much more technology in there this time. I&#8217;m confident that KDE 4.1 which is supposed to be released sometime in august this year, will absolutely rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranny</title>
		<link>http://gofedora.com/review-kde4-worth-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>kranny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=191#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Nice review n pics....i was jus thinking to give it a shot....
U saved ma bandwidth...[:P]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review n pics&#8230;.i was jus thinking to give it a shot&#8230;.<br />
U saved ma bandwidth&#8230;[:P]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Bess</title>
		<link>http://gofedora.com/review-kde4-worth-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Bess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=191#comment-277</guid>
		<description>haha, that is wild; you have the exact same thoughts I had while experiencing the &quot;upgrade&quot;. I was planning on using it on my work computer (Ubuntu), then another developer installed it before me (Ubuntu). Lucky me! Although he did install it side-by-side, it was still a big waste of time. He berated it as much as possible before finally moving back to kde3. I love the KDE/Qt library, but the KDE4 Team seems to have corrupted a great code base. I&#039;ll wait for KDE 4.5! Great blog site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha, that is wild; you have the exact same thoughts I had while experiencing the &#8220;upgrade&#8221;. I was planning on using it on my work computer (Ubuntu), then another developer installed it before me (Ubuntu). Lucky me! Although he did install it side-by-side, it was still a big waste of time. He berated it as much as possible before finally moving back to kde3. I love the KDE/Qt library, but the KDE4 Team seems to have corrupted a great code base. I&#8217;ll wait for KDE 4.5! Great blog site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Visitor</title>
		<link>http://gofedora.com/review-kde4-worth-upgrading/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=191#comment-279</guid>
		<description>If you are running KDE 4.0 I would recommend that you upgrade to KDE 4.1. This sounds like a bug with regards to retrieving and storing the appropriate geometry. I run KDE 4.1 and are not affected by this. KDE 4.1 is an extremely large improvement on KDE 4.0 anyway, and is well worth the upgrade.
&lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.hubclothing.com/&quot;&gt;designer denim&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are running KDE 4.0 I would recommend that you upgrade to KDE 4.1. This sounds like a bug with regards to retrieving and storing the appropriate geometry. I run KDE 4.1 and are not affected by this. KDE 4.1 is an extremely large improvement on KDE 4.0 anyway, and is well worth the upgrade.<br />
<a rel="follow" href="http://www.hubclothing.com/">designer denim</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

