https://gofedora.com/intelligentmirror-rpm-deb-caching-improved-04/ How Tos, Tutorials, Tips and Tricks Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:19:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.4 https://gofedora.com/intelligentmirror-rpm-deb-caching-improved-04/comment-page-1/#comment-409 Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:35:11 +0000 http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=454#comment-409 Thanks for the wonderful insight. I’ll check/read the entire concept of packaging and then will see what can be done to sort out this problem.

]]> https://gofedora.com/intelligentmirror-rpm-deb-caching-improved-04/comment-page-1/#comment-406 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=454#comment-406 Tried it on F9 and it seems to work (I’d already tweaked the SELinux settings when I installed 0.3). It should be noted that one should mv RPM packages in the spool directory to the new rpm/ subdirectory so as not to lose them.

]]> https://gofedora.com/intelligentmirror-rpm-deb-caching-improved-04/comment-page-1/#comment-407 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=454#comment-407 Unfortunately, your assumption 7. is not valid when packages can get signed/resigned. For example, Rawhide packages are replaced with signed versions for test releases and releases which are then put in the same location. And how does IntelligentMirror cope with the Fedora newkey resigning? Does it compare the whole URL (not just the file name)?

]]> https://gofedora.com/intelligentmirror-rpm-deb-caching-improved-04/comment-page-1/#comment-408 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://172.17.8.64/gofedora/?p=454#comment-408 Thanks. I forgot to mention that.

]]>